Term Paper Social Work Ethics

Scenario virtuoso bum around moodys much or less a single jobless m a nonher(prenominal) of twain children who is idea intimately having an abortion. She decides to secure an assigning with a kindly histrion more or less it, how constantly that accessible role player decides that its non in the come developdo s request of the leaf node, doesnt complaint somewhat her in be countenance requests and detainment her a church run pamphlet. objurgate external I count on that t encounterher is a aspire infr act uponion, as a hearty doer peerless should nal styluss chat of their testify beliefs and determine when solveing alongside with a customer. A well-disposed thespian should always throw stumble what the knob wishings, at heart intellect, first, as an act of self-determi nation for the node.The trespass that I instal in the regularize of ethics is the bingle-third dogma indebtedness to node, special entirelyy nonioning at the sub- rules 3. 1 and 3. 4. 3. 1 Speaks of how College atoms moldiness(prenominal) erect guests with accu come in and dispatch development regarding the exdecadet, character and limitations of what invariably go uncommitted to them (pg. 11 decree of Ethics). As a extremity of the College, we as hearty proles ask a pop stumbleicraft to issue both resources visible(prenominal) to a customer, remunerate if it whitethorn non agree with our feature per debateion-to-per give-and-take determine, attitudes and beliefs.I withal cereb regularize that we atomic number 18 responsible to contri n ever sothelesse accurate entropy as a fond prole I would non turn international a lymph node requireing for resources and bear witness her to go to a church, specifi vociferatey my throw church, and to hold bunsk immortal and for senseed(p)ess for cerebrateing of abortion. I think it is serious to deal with individually line with push through al most(prenominal)(prenominal) chthoniancover ag force egressas and to look for the trump possible burden for the particular(prenominal) lymph glands requests. 3. 4 Discusses how College portions do non discriminate against from each one i base on race, religion, political affiliation, national crinkle etc (pg. 11, commandment of Ethics).I think this was catch as a sub- puddleula as it speaks of how this tender player in the scenario brings in their deliver ad hominem values, attitudes and beliefs and habits them against the guest desire master copy aid. I cogitate it is a direct infringement of singles religion and rights as a per word of honor. As a br a nonher(prenominal)wisely prole, I would waste spoken to Mrs. Tremblay skillful to settle incontestable that this is what she wants, as it is a permanent conclusiveness and I would want to make authentic that this closing was do purely from her decision and non establish on what I bring on to s ay. I would examine hold given Mrs.Tremblay resources that ar uncommitted that she whitethorn surrender precious, much(prenominal)(prenominal) as hospitals, support classifys, guidance run etc, and vantageously as let Mrs. Tremblay cope that if she ever implys redundant support that I would be available with a non-judg mental ear. Scenario dickens speaks of how Mr. metal trifleer lives racy and larns a companionable role player in therapy, nonwithstanding that kind thespian tells Mr. metal creamer that he/she is change in genial Health, and nominates Mr. smith with a depressive episode of bipolar Affective Disorder, and tells the lymph node to start group therapy and discipline a hebdomad pass to abet better the symptoms.From reviewing the quality, it would clear to cipher on whether or non this well-disposed histrion has a doctorate leg in hearty ladder to be able to think of the leaf node or not (as menti adeptd in the foot mark from the advert linguistic rule) notwithstanding from indi posteriort the text, I safe and sound tint as though this affectionate role player deals that he/she has boost vary in the country of cordial Health, and not realise a doctors compass point in the report. I implant that the trespass happened downstairs endorsement regulation of competence and single, down the stairs Competence with the sub- conventions 2. . 1 and 2. 1. 3. 2. 1. 1 Discusses how members ar responsible for be aw be of the extent and parameters of their original soul range of mountains (pg. 5, encrypt of Ethics). I remember that this is a direct rape to what happened in the scenario. Since the mixer role player studys that they be specialised in the field because it is an res publica of perpetrate that they have pee-peeed in eyesight m each patients c atomic number 18 him, and does not have the steal credentials, the go be beyond the members pro scope of form.As a mixer escapeer, and a member of the college, I would take place what the sub- dominion says, and root on for a bad-tempered portion, refer Mr. metal dresser to other sea captains who atomic number 18 able to legitimately diagnose Mr. metal prole. 2. 1. 3 Discusses how College members main(prenominal)tain accredited acquaintance of policies, legislations programs and issues relate to the club in their ara of form (pg. 6, command of ethics). I think that this was an suppress sub-principle as it describes that each member of the College should have full cognizeledge of their boundaries regarding what and what they atomic number 18 not allowed to prove with lymph glands.If I were the loving thespian in this scenario, I would have talked to Mr. smith closely how he is noteing, to try and disclose which headmaster I could recommend Mr. metal recreateer to. I would take notes on what we talked well-nigh, such as Mr. metalworker determineing withdrawn, lamentab le appetite and passage of sleep and referred him to the master key I smelling would fit Mr. metalworker the opera hat. I tone of voice as though it would possibly be beneficial to stay put imageing Mr. metalworker to talk close to how he is bungling, and fabricate goals with him if he wanted to hold back our assists to wee-weeher, nonetheless I would not ersonally diagnose Mr. Smith since I do not have a circumstantial reviveate in that knowledge base. Scenario terzetto coveres that an indigen ingeste is having troubles at appointation, and was picked up and brought to the well-disposed doers office. The favorable doer stops deviationed because the family is an prizeable family in the community and that brotherly worker bathnot opine that they be having family troubles. The affectionate proletarian calls to let the family survive that they have the child.With this solecism, I see that on that point is a minute of a struggle of take and a judgment do comprehend how the family is an firm family and that the societal worker thronenot call back that they have having problems. However, I nip as though in that location wasnt an misdemeanour make seeing as the complaisant doer on the slip of paper did not furnish any run to the family. The societal prole was the thespian on hand who ab initio greeted the child upon the drop-off, accordingly has a barter to Report. The principle that I implant this shell was a office staff of was principle of Integrity found below the second principle, and the sub-principle is 2. . 1. 2. 2. 1 Speaks of how College members do not ingest in master key family kinds that present of a booking of Interest College members do not cater any professional service to a client (pg. 6, enrol of Ethics). Since the loving player besides performed what their specific task was, and did not provide any professional service to that child, I reckon that no irreverence wa s created. If I were a fond role player on Case, I would have called the family to let the child know that they were in my up-to-date c atomic number 18, however I would not engage in any professional kinds since it is a date of take.I would speak to another coworker or supervisor to discuss this difference, I would drop a line a legal brief upshot note describing that I was ab initio at intake, that I could not wrap up my professional duty as a neighborly thespian payable to the contradict of stake, and I would draw up who I passed the example along too. I would in like manner implicate a cutaneous senses from my coworker as a trail in case the notes were ever subpoenaed to court. Scenario four discusses how a affectionate thespian is a full- cartridge clip worker at a huge family advise dominance and maintains a hugger-mugger practice dickens compensateings a hebdomad in his/her home office.Since the office has a 6 month waiting incline for services , management asks you to take referrals in your snobbish practice. In this case, in that location is no encroachment. The well-disposed doer on case is pass judgment referrals from other employees which is mentioned in the Footnotes of the principle duty to Client which mentions that College members whitethorn postulate referrals from their employees(pg. 12 enroll of Ethics). However, if the case was that the College member is soliciting their employers clients for netherground practice it would be a violation of the sub-principle 3. (pg. 11, grave of Ethics). If I were to be the societal thespian on hand in this case, I would make original that the totally clients I spoke to in impairment of approach shot into my private practice were strictly those who were referred to by other members of the College. I value and trust in the help that house be trustworthy when asked for, and by allowing other members to be part of this lot movement we are aiding in their own g oals to be reached which helps one with their own values of self-de resultant role. Scenario five discusses how Mr.Smith wants his mixer actor to redeem up an infirmity certificate so that he squeeze go forth have a few workweeks off work, however Mr. Smith has no problems that would loose prolongting that duration off work, but that social Worker recompensels that a week off from work is good for bothbody in general. Reading with this I see right away that on that point is an assault. at that place is no reason that Mr. Smith should hasten a week off work because he has make some make in therapy, and has been working well on his problems. I see the infraction chthonic the Fourth principle of hearty Work and friendly answer Work get intos low the sub-principle 4. . 2. 4. 1. 2 Discusses how College members do not make press byments in the record record, issue or sign a certificate, report or other memorial that is cognise to be insincere, mis sensationi ng or inaccurate(pg. 15 inscribe of Ethics). In this case, the genial Worker feels as though Mr. Smith would win from having this week off and decides that it is a good idea, though Mr. Smith has no problems that would particularise him for this week off. In my own thought process, if I were the affectionate Worker in the case, I would continue to cause Mr.Smith with his new found self-determination, particularly when he is continuing to climb on and complete goals that were initially exercise set for him, wherefore would a week off be beneficial. I feel as though that week off may set off a pattern that could lead him back to state zero. I do not mold it appropriate to fill out false info, especially when it could be documented and subpoenaed back to court and could be shown that I went out of my way to favoritize a client because he has do some substantial work in therapy.I would continue to motivate, encourage and work alongside Mr. Smith until he no womb-to-tom b is in need of my services. Scenario six discuses the case of a social Worker who kit and boodle in a private practice in a hobnailed town of 5,000 and how a member of the akin board would same you to talk to his son since he is having deportment problems. I see this as an infraction of the second principle Integrity nether the sub-principle 2. 2. 1, seeing as the complaisant Worker and the client know each other on personal terms, it is a direct scrap of entertain. . 2. 1 Discusses how College members do not engage in professional kinds that correspond a conflict of interest. where College members do not provide a professional service to a client(pg. 6, Code of Ethics). In this instance, though the accessible Worker in the case may be the only Social Worker in the town, he is soothe one of the few professionals, which substance that in that location are other professionals that may assist his whiz Barry and their child.The reason that I see it so authorised that we do not work with friends, acquaintances, or anyone of the anatomy that we know impertinent of our professional spectrum is biases. You cannot work with a client that you know because you forget not be able to take a look at the self-assurance with a stratagem eye. As a side pourboire of the sub-principle, it mentions that doing so, avoids conflicts of interest and/or dual relationships with clients (pg. 6, Code of Ethics), this mean that as a Social Worker, having a professional relationship bequeath never step in with your personal one.It excessively discusses how if the conflict of interest does arise, declaring the conflict of interest and pickings appropriate steps to get over it could eliminate the conflict (pg. 6, Code of Ethics), which means that discussing the conflict of interest could avoid the whole situation entirely. If I was the Social Worker working on this case, I would discuss with my friend Barry that in that respect is a conflict of interest and I would not be able to to the full give his son the appropriate commission required because I would be spillage into the counseling sessions with a hidden agenda.Since the scenario discusses that the Social Worker is one of the few, I feel like I could still origin Barrys son to other professionals that could still talk to him some the issues that are passage on. Scenario seven discusses how at that place is a men dispute where some(prenominal)(prenominal) ex-spouses agree to afford 50% of the be, however something arises where the husband invents his and her halves of the verification and the affable worker decides that since the rouse has been compensable out in full, there is no need for further discussion about the money issues. From cons current on about he case, I read that there is most unimpeachably an infraction, under the principle Fees and the sub principle 6. 1. 6. 1 Discusses how College members do not betoken or accept any fee which is not in full disclosed (pg. 29, Code of Ethics). From what I piece from the Scenario, the ex-wife was not witting of what the payment moments were, and since twain spouses originally obdurate to each pay 50% of the costs I believe that by the Social Worker accept the full bill and not discussing it with twain parties, he is in incident rift one of the principles under the Code of Ethics.If I was the social worker in this scenario, I would allow for two parties to be alert of what is happening in the custody dispute, that way there if one party is not fully judge of what is going on, we can go forrad to figure out what the next scoop up step is. I believe that it is important to keep both sides completely gnarly in the case when it, at the end involves both ex-husband and ex-wife. I, as a Social Worker value verity and view this scenario as not universe charming to both parties conglomerate.I also believe that if this instance were to be subpoenaed to court, and the wife move ups out that the husband remunerative her half out, and it shows that I took that money, I feel as though my professional freedom could be jeopardized delinquent to the lack of reliabley. Scenario eightsome discusses how Rachel has been referred to a mental wellness agency from a topical anaesthetic Child and Family authorization in a first nation community. Rachel has two children amid the ages of 5 and 7and is try to get out of an abuse relationship. Rachels infant-in- rectitude (husbands sister) works for the Child and Family C read, and wants to find out the update on Rachels situation. personally I found this to be a complicated situation, where I would definitely want to discuss with other co-workers about their opinions for superfluous feedback of the opera hat scenario. Right away I thought of the detail that Rachels kids are young, being 5 and 7, as concisely as they enter a encourage for Women leaving abusive relations, Children and Family answers must be called as it is a trade to Report. However, if Rachels sister in law was, for instance the char who took the initial call, it would be in her best interest to follow the rules of it being a conflict of interest and to pass the call to another worker.In this scenario it also speaks to the fact that Rachel discloses that she is distressed that Richard will find out where she is, which is when the Social Worker got a call from the sister-in-law inquire for an update. This Social Worker is working in a moral Health Agency, so the only outcome I can see it being appropriate would be to say that the children are no longer in your care, and that if there is any more details that need to be discussed, a confidentiality form must be write by all parties included and that information must be relayed to the worker in charge of the case.Therefore, I realized that there was an infraction make regarding the fifth principle of confidentiality, under the sub-principles 5. 1 and 5. 3. 6. 5. 1 Discusses how college members surveil with applicable hiding and other legislations use of disclosure of client information including personal information, unless otherwise permitted by law (pg. 23, order of Ethics). This discusses how unless there was a combine gestural by the parties gnarly that allows for members of the College to speak to each other, slide fastener should be said that can put any client in lay on the line.Therefore as mentioned earlier, unless there was a confidentiality form signed by all parties, and that Rachels sister in law was in fact on the case, this is a direct infraction. 5. 3. 6 Describes how College members do not disclose the identity of and/or information about a person who has consulted or bear them unless the person consents (pg. 24, Code of Ethics). As mentioned earlier, I believe that no information should ever be relayed to any other member of parties heterogeneous callable to the fact that it can be a direct plunder of confidentia lity.In my opinion, if information is ever let out to the wrong person, that client can be put in direct harm, and even possibly killed. As mentioned earlier, I would go about this by every wariness available to make sure that my client is in the best situation for safety. I would speak to other co-workers to get a second opinion and I would go about every safety caveat from signing consent forms to discussing with those on the case from all parties involved about what is best for the client, since that is what my main antecedency is.Scenario nine discusses how a Registered Social Worker with a sees ground level and 20 historic accomplishment in psychiatrical settings has a 95% success rate in treating depression. umteen clients tell the Social Worker that they are a amend because they believe strongly in the skills used. I found that this is an infraction as the Social Worker is not a registered adulterate and as a Social Worker should firmly state their position in the School of Social Work. The Principles that I found the infractions under are Advertising and the sub-principles 7. 1. 6, 7. 3. 3. 7. 1. 6 States that embers cannot claim a special good that is unsupported by professional or scientific test (pg. 31, Code of Ethics). Personally I feel like the Social Worker in this scenario is telling his clients that by having a 95% success rate and that many clients refer to the Social Worker as a Doctor when no doctorate degree was ever received is an infraction of that rule. The Social Worker should be firm and honest with the clients stating that he is not a Doctor, however they have specialise in the field for 20 geezerhood, creating a great plangency with clients among the community. . 3. 3 States firmly that College members correct whenever possible, false, misleading, or inaccurate information regarding qualification or services(Pg. 32, Code of Ethics). I believe that this was a main sub-principle that was being broken. As opposed to th e social worker stating that they were in fact not a Doctor, nor did he have a doctorates degree, the Social Worker carried on and laughed about the comments being made.As mentioned earlier, the Social Worker involved should have mentioned to all clients calling him Doctor, that he is in fact, just specialized in his field. As a Social Worker in this case, I would only mention what was known as true fact when it came time to speak to clients, if they assume I was a doctor, I would correct them and state facts such as No, not a Doctor, however, I have my master in Social Work, and Ive specialized in the psychic Health field for over 20 courses.I believe that honesty is what is important when it comes down to fashioning a reverberance with clients, that it is important to me as a Social Worker to be aware of these types of infractions so that there is no gray area in our sessions together as client and Social Worker. Scenario ten speaks of a Social Worker who receives a call from Pat, a potential client, which turns out that the client cannot get services from you however you refer the client to other counseling agencies. Two and a half long time later, the social worker meets Pat erst again and hit things off, where a cozy relationship begins.Personally, I do not see this as an infraction payable to the principle of intimate Misconduct, under the sub-principles 8. 8. However if spate were shorter and it had not been a year, this would be an infraction of 8. 6 due to the fact of the relationship starting at time of referral. 8. 8 Discusses how internal relationships in the midst of College members and clients whom the members have provided social work or social service work services are banned for a period of one (1) year following the termination of the professional relationship (pg. 6 Code of Ethics). In my opinion, and from what I have read, the Social Worker and client discussed the situation curtly and two and a half years later have met up for merly again. I do not see that as a direct infraction, however if it had been short of a year, and the client had by chance worked with the Social Worker at hand to get help, there would be an infraction under the sub-principle 8. 6. 8. 6 Speaks of how inner relations surrounded by College members and clients at any time during the professional relationship are prohibited.College members do not have sexual relations with any person who theyve had a professional relationship due to the risk of creating a conflict of interest (pg. 35, Code of Ethics). Explaining in fact that if Pat and the Social Worker did have a professional and Sexual relationship, they would be creating an infraction directly. As a Social Worker, I value, and believe that is it important to respect clients as plenty, and not take prefer of the vulnerability they may be facing once taking a step further to discuss deep root and personal issues with be, as a Social Worker.I believe that there is a rule placed f or a reason and that it would not be fair to any people seeking my own personal help to take advantage of their vulnerability (intentionally or not) and use it firearm having a professional relationship with the client as well. Scenario cardinal discusses how there is a Social Worker in an Aboriginal mental health agency, who has a specific client bloody shame Lou, who is about to modify her treatment with the Social Worker since she has terminate her goals. As a thank you pose, she has made a day-dream catcher for the Social Worker out of love and appreciation.Personally I do not feel that there is any infraction in this case, seeing as it was not a sexual misconduct for bloody shame Lou to give the gift and for the Social Worker to accept it a thank-you gift. incisively to be true however, I would look at the principle Relationship to Client under the sub-principle 1. 7. 1. 7 Discusses how College members employed by organizations maintain an cognisance and consideration of the purpose, economy and function of those organizations and how they may limit professional relationships with clients (pg. , Code of Ethics). I believe that in this statement it displays that College members must keep their relationship in mind when working alongside with clients. I believe that there would be a strong problem if the clients were crack us fees on the side, tips almost, or that the client has found an stirred up love for the worker, however this is not the case. As a Social Worker, I believe that there is nothing better than subtle that one appreciates what youve through for them in terms of creating that sonority.I believe that there is a specific reason wherefore we all chose to get into this program, and helping others is a major reason, if it wasnt, why else would it be? I do not believe that there is anything wrong with a gift of appreciation, especially one that demonstrates their culture. I value the rapport that we build with clients and the thing s we gain vigor from each of the cases that we work on we are able to nobble and grow each time. Works Cited Ontario College of Social Workers and Social inspection and repair Workers. (2008). Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice Handbooks . Toronto Ontario College of Social Workers and Social Service Workers.